Swedish princess, it’s time to reduce your carbon emissions.

　　(This article was first published in "youli-youmian" WeChat WeChat official account, by Tang Ge)

　　Greta Thonberg, a Swedish woman who was portrayed as an "environmental princess" by the United States and the West, was afraid to say anything about Japanese nuclear waste water and American toxic waste, but on May 7th, she suddenly woke up and began to criticize China for polluting the environment.

　　The excuse is that an organization called Rongding Group of the United States calculated that China’s greenhouse gas emissions accounted for 27% of the world in 2019, with the largest emissions. The United States accounts for 11%, making it the second largest environmental polluter. The third place is India, which accounts for about 6.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions. According to the report, China’s emissions have more than tripled in the past 30 years. But in terms of per capita emissions, China is still lower than the United States.

　　What followed was the anger of the princess of environmental protection. She accused China of emitting more greenhouse gases than all developed countries combined, and then criticized that although China was still listed as a "developing country" by the World Trade Organization and was responsible for producing many global commodities, it was not an excuse for China to destroy the environment, stressing that "unless China completely changed its policy, we could not solve the climate crisis".

　　Although the report also said that China’s per capita carbon dioxide emission is about 10.1 tons, which is lower than that of OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) member countries’ 10.5 tons, while that of the United States is about 17.6 tons, which continues to rank first.

　　But for American content, Thonberg suddenly fell asleep again, just like facing Japanese nuclear waste water.

　　In this regard, Chen Weihua, president of the China Journal’s EU branch, retorted on May 8th, criticizing that "your public relations team (Thonberg) should teach you more".

　　First, the population of China is twice that of the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, whose members are basically developed countries), so the per capita emissions are much lower; Second, the OECD has transferred a large number of polluting industries to China or other developing countries, so don’t pretend that you are innocent; Third, by far, OECD is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in history.

　　Chen Weihua pointed out: "I can’t believe that you should defend these developed countries with the largest emissions in two centuries, ‘ Destroy the future and present living environment? ’ Do you know that many people in developing countries don’t even have electricity and live on less than $1 a day? Do you want this lifestyle to continue? A very simple example is that if H&M produces all raw materials and clothing in Sweden, the emissions of Sweden or OECD will rise. What will happen if about 5000 major OECD companies do the same? So recognize the facts and be fair! "

　　Chen Weihua finally criticized: "It was the World Bank that classified China as ‘ Developing countries ’ If you want to raise an objection to the World Bank, please do it at once. They will provide you with all the statistical information. "

　　Who is the princess of environmental protection? I think netizens have probably heard of it.

　　This is an adult Swedish woman. A few years ago, it was suddenly packaged by the "environmental protection forces" in Europe and the United States, and it was enthusiastically embraced. Then it delivered speeches around the world, and even criticized the heads of state at the United Nations General Assembly, which was praised by them as the "hope" for the future of mankind.

　　Because Thonberg was young a few years ago, she was called the little princess of environmental protection by the packager. When she grew up, she became an environmental protection girl again. Now … … Can only be called the princess of environmental protection.

　　With the influence of the United States and the West, Thonberg once called on millions of students around the world to strike. Under the full push of western politicians and media, it has become the idol of many teenagers. In 2019, a little boy in Hong Kong took it as an idol, and a man held a sign at the entrance of the village to protest against the environmental pollution of the SAR government.

　　On March 30th this year, the University of Winchester in the United Kingdom "sculpted the golden body" for her and set up an isometric bronze statue in recognition of her contribution to environmental protection.

　　The BBC also produced a special documentary for her, telling the story of this environmental saint with a pious voice and a worship perspective. All the filters and shaking lenses in China’s report have disappeared.

　　If we only engage in environmental protection, it can be regarded as benefiting mankind. However, the princess never planted a tree or went to the desert to plant a piece of grass. Instead, she ran around, holding a lot of protest cards, which was quite polluting the environment. Although it claims to be a vegetarian, from the growth results, carbon emissions are actually not small.

　　The lifestyle that pollutes the earth the most is living in Europe and America. Why doesn’t she criticize it?

　　Brother Right will give you a small example:

　　In most parts of the United States, it is forbidden to dry clothes, even if you dry them on your balcony, your neighbors will report you immediately. What about Americans drying clothes? Then dry it with electricity. 300 million Americans have 88 million electric dryers, each of which consumes an average of 1079 kWh of electricity every year. It is equivalent to a dryer, which is the annual electricity consumption of an ordinary China family. Americans don’t want to do such simple things as moving hands and drying clothes. No one criticizes them for not protecting the environment. No one suppresses them with the future of mankind. Chinese eats a piece of meat with chopsticks and becomes the object of criticism? Even the per capita meat consumption in Chinese is not as high as that in the United States.

　　For example, Academician Ding Zhongli of Chinese Academy of Sciences questioned Chai Jing’s words: Is Chinese a human being?

　　For another example:

　　According to the data released by NASA satellites, about one quarter of the newly-added green area in the world from 2000 to 2017 came from China, ranking first in the world in terms of contribution. Researchers believe that the reason is that China has outstanding performance in afforestation and intensive agriculture.

　　Why can China become the country with the largest green area in the world? Because there are countless Chinese who plant trees day after day in the Gobi Desert in northwest China, and with their own hands, they really protect the natural environment and benefit all mankind.

　　For example, the Tianmu Desert, which is closest to Beijing, began to be rectified in 2003. Under the hard work of the PLA officers and men, this desert was gradually controlled, and now only 200 acres are left. Now this 200-mu desert has become a popular tourist attraction and film and television shooting base, and it needs special protection, otherwise it will be "destroyed" by the vegetation that has been restored around it carelessly.

　　Twenty years ago, the greening rate in China was only 13%, while that in developed countries was above 30%. This was written in the textbooks of China students that year, so that Chinese people could learn from shame and be brave, understand their own shortcomings, and then fully build China. In 2020, the forest coverage rate in China has reached 22.96%. Although it has not caught up with the developed countries, it has made great progress.

　　These, the princess of environmental protection can’t see, she can only see what caters to western politicians. Last year, she didn’t do anything serious, mixed up with Hong Kong drug activities, and put up a sign on the Internet to support Huang Zhifeng’s activities in support of "12 Hong Kong drugs".

　　What is the relationship between Hong Kong poison and environmental protection?

　　Of course, it does matter. They are all different pieces under western politicians, and their purpose is to make trouble for developing countries. Hong Kong poison can hinder the development of the largest developing country. The princess of environmental protection is not to be outdone, and I will come!

　　Taking advantage of the "righteousness" of environmental protection and benefiting all mankind, western countries can justly interfere with developing countries and curb their development.

　　Thonberg, a vocal environmentalist, wants to keep the earth as it is. Developed countries have developed, transferring industries with high energy consumption and high pollution to developing countries, and continuing to live a good life by collecting patent fees as an "environmental protection" way. And people in developing countries want to produce more wealth through their hardworking hands? Sorry, that will emit carbon dioxide. For the sake of the future of mankind, you are not allowed to live the rich life of us Swedes.

　　Although people in developed countries are using a lot of fossil fuels and driving large-displacement cars, which wastes a lot of resources and pollutes the earth, they can criticize Chinese for using chopsticks and eating meat is not environmentally friendly.

　　While China is silently making contributions to all mankind and making every effort to develop new energy sources, save energy and reduce emissions, western politicians do not reflect on themselves, but occupy the so-called moral commanding heights by touting the "role model" of the environmental princess. It sounds like it’s for the future of all mankind. In fact, it’s destroying the earth while suppressing the development of developing countries.

　　Only when developing countries live at the bottom forever can they keep their highly polluted lives.

　　Chinese environmental protection VS western environmental protection

　　One is to reclaim the land from the desert inch by inch and actually save the earth with both hands.

　　One is to continue to drive large-displacement cars to pollute the earth after generating a lot of garbage and holding placards to protest.

　　Who is really saving the earth and mankind, and who is the hope of mankind in the future … …